Buy Low Price From Here Now
The Omron HEM-650 Wrist Blood Pressure Monitor with APS (Advanced Positioning Sensor) uses Omron's patented IntelliSense technology, which inflates the wrist cuff to the ideal level with each use and offers fast, personalized, and automatic inflation for maximum comfort.
Readmore
Technical Details
- Advanced positioning sensor- IntelliSence Sigma Cuff Technology for accurate reading
- Irregular heartbeat detector
- Date and Time feature
- 90 Memory with averaging last three readings
See more technical details
By B. Briggs (West Texas)
This BP Monitor is easy to use and seem accurate when checking it against my OMRON HEM-71C. It is small and easy to carry.
By Keith W. Joyner (DC/PA)
I've purchased several Omron products and been happy with them all. This B/P cuff has large numerals, is easy to use, and has a function to alert for arrhythmias-my Mom loves it!
By Martin D. Graboski
This Hem-650 seems to be extremely accurate and very easy to use. The consecutive readings are very
close and either the systolic or diastolic are the same as previous readings or both. I would strongly
suggest that anybody with hypertension buy the Hem-650 from Omron. You cannot get a bad reading
as it will only take a reading if you hold your wrist in the right place.
By Eye Forget
There are reviews that question the accuracy of wrist blood pressure monitors. Consider the following before you listen to them.
1) Blood pressure varies considerably during any given day. Going to the doctor every three months or so indicates nothing with respect to blood pressure. I've have a bad heart attack and am currently in the throes of medication induced diastolic pressure in the 30's. Monitoring is important and my cardiologist places far more importance on my home readings than what his aids give him with a sphygmomanometer. On the subject of a wrist monitor, he says make sure the position is right.
2) "A study conducted in Switzerland compared the blood pressure measured by a wrist monitor with the traditional mercury sphygmomanometer measuring blood pressure from the upper arm, and a catheter placed directly in the artery, which is the 'gold standard' of blood pressure measurement. It was done in 100 patients who were undergoing catheterization of their hearts, which entailed measurement of blood pressure from inside the major arteries. It was found that the wrist monitor gave readings that were a little closer to the pressure measured directly from the artery than the readings given by the mercury sphygmomanometer."
Basically, the wrist unit will produce superior results than what the doctors are using.
3) The British have done similar studies to the Swiss and confirmed wrist units are more accurate than sphygmomanometers.
4) Sphygmomanometers are hard to use. There lot's of variability in their readings. Health "professionals" that stand behind them are a bit out of date.
5) Positioning is important. Read the instructions.
By Kermit (Alabama)
When I received this item my first impression was its size. I was impressed! It consisted of one compact unit and included a case not much larger than a watch case. It was easy to position around the wrist and to operate. The only problem was it only worked one time every 10-12 attempts. The rest of the times it refused to recognize my heart, no matter where I positioned my wrist (yes, I identified which wrist I was using).
I called Omron in a last-ditch effort to ascertain what the problem was before returning it A friendly representative who seemed genuinely interested in my problem proceeded to walk me though the default settings. After several failed attempts to get it to work it finally operated satisfactorily. The next attempt was also successful. Figuring my problems were over, I ended the conversation. Then the monitor immediately failed to recognize my heart again.
It was then I came to this forum for some ideas. I dismissed the article that stated the unit would not work on overweight people. However, I was most interested in those comments stating their unit would only work when the Advanced Positioning Sensor (APS) was "OFF". I turned it OFF and the unit then recognized my heart and proceeded to provide blood pressure readings. Five stars to the Amazon Customer Reviews!
My concern is why the company engineered such a feature as APS without doing more lab studies. Rather than recognizing my heart, as it was designed to do, it essentially rendered the unit useless. An even larger concern is why their representative never even mentioned that fact that the APS might have been my problem. I find it difficult to believe they are not aware of the situation.
I am using the product in consonance with a program combining exercise, diet and medicine to reduce my high blood pressure. Continued high blood pressure could result in my undergoing Angioplasty or heart bypass surgery. So it is imperative that I obtain frequent and accurate readings.
I satisfied the "frequent" requirement by checking my pressure 4 times/day. It was up to the unit to provide the accuracy. In this regard it failed miserably!
My average blood pressure readings with the Omron were 117/65. But when I used a unit in a local drugstore my reading was 152/90. Figuring (and hoping) that the store unit was defective or not calibrated, I proceeded to take another reading at another drugstore. This time my reading was 150/92. Fearing the worst, I went to my family doctor to compare a reading with their unit to my Omron HEM-650.
My suspicions were verified. A reading with the doctor's unit was almost 40 points higher than the Omron. By relying on this unit I was becoming closer to a heart attack or stroke every day without even realizing it. This provided me a false sense of security which could have led me to a one-way trip to the cemetery.
Eventually I compared the Omron readings with 4 other units. The four units all agreed with each other. However, all their readings were 35-40 points higher than with the Omron.
I returned the HEM-650 to Omron Repair Services. While awaiting its return I decided to purchase another model. This model wasn't quite as compact or convenient to use. But at least it wasn't an "Omron" model. It was listed as a "ReliOn" model. But wait! After a little research it became obvious that this was also an Omron, model HEM-741 CREL disguised as a "ReliOn" model. It appears Omron has something to hide. I must say I don't blame them.
When I used the HEM-74 CREL the readings were similar to the other four units I had tested and 30-40 points higher than the HEM-650.
When the "repaired" monitor arrived, the enclosed Repair Report stated "No adjustments needed. Unit working per specifications". When I checked it again it was still 30-40 points too low.
I also found the "Settings" to be unduly complicated. For example, "On" means the APS is turned on (but it can also mean the unit is set to work on the right wrist). And "Off" means the APS is turned off (but it can also mean the unit is set to work on the left wrist). What "Genius" designed that system?
It is imperative you use an accurate blood pressure monitor, particularly if your blood pressure is high, like mine. Relying on inaccurate low readings with the Omron could jeopardize your very life. I suggest you run, not walk away from this monitor. If you insist on using it I would strongly suggest you check it for accuracy by calibrating it with an accurate, professional unit.
Class action suits have been initiated by legal agencies that represent those who have been injured or even died by using "FDA approved" drugs that did not comply with company claims. These cases are listed on TV all the time. Perhaps such a suit should be initiated against Omron on behalf of those customers who were provided a false sense of security by inaccurate blood pressure readings provided by this unit, resulting in surgery that should have been undertaken sooner. Unnecessarily delayed surgery could result in strokes and heart attacks.
Images Product
Buy Omron HEM-650 Wrist Blood Pressure Monitor with APS (Advanced Positioning Sensor) Now
0 comments:
Post a Comment